Amicus Brief: Allegheny Reproductive Health v. Pennsylvania DHS

The ERA Project submitted an amicus, or friend of the court, brief with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explaining why a state ban on public funding for abortion is a form of sex discrimination, in violation of the state’s Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). In the brief filed in Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department Of Human Services, the ERA Project provided the Court with an overview of how the denial of reproductive health care in general, and access to abortion in particular, has been found by the United States Supreme Court, other state courts, and many prominent legal scholars, to amount to a form of sex-based discrimination.

This brief explains how denial of access to abortion violates the Pennsylvania ERA and amounts to a form of sex discrimination in several different ways because i) the ban burdens women’s access to health care in ways that men are not similarly burdened, ii) the ban is based on stereotypes about gender-based identities and roles in society, and forces pregnant people to conform to an outdated gendered destiny in the home raising children rather than in the workplace, the boardroom, the statehouse, or other more “masculine” spheres of life, and iii) the capacity to rationally plan or space parenthood by people who bear the largest burden of childrearing—typically women— renders them incapable of participating equally in the workplace, in politics, and in other contexts fundamental to robust citizenship.

The ban on public funding for abortion imposes a significant barrier to fundamental reproductive choice, and this barrier is essentially rooted in a long history of outdated sex-based classifications, odious sex stereotyping, and documented impediments to equal citizenship for all Pennsylvanians, regardless of their sex.
— Ting Ting Cheng, ERA Project Director
As scholars of sex equality generally, and of measures such as the Pennsylvania
Equal Rights Amendment in particular, our brief provided the court with several ways in which the abortion ban violates fundamental sex equality principles. Whichever path the court takes, the destination is unavoidable: the abortion ban violates the Pennsylvania Constitution’s protections securing sex-based equality.
— Prof. Katherine Franke, Faculty Director
Previous
Previous

Explainer on the Status of the ERA